Back to human influence Step 4 · Extreme events

A changing risk is not the same as a single event

Research can assess long-term changes in heat and heavy rainfall. Whether and how climate change influenced a particular event is a different question. We keep these two types of claim separate.

Scientific assessment

What does the evidence show?

The following statements refer to the IPCC's 2021 assessment, not a continuously updated forecast for your location.

Heat

Hot extremes are increasing

01

Observed

Since the 1950s, hot extremes have become more frequent and more intense across most land regions.

02

Attributed

The IPCC assesses with high confidence that human-caused climate change is the main driver of this change.

03

What this does not establish

This assessment does not quantify the influence on a particular hot day or heatwave.

IPCC AR6, Summary A.3.1
An important limit

Climate trends and event attribution are two different questions

Long-term trend

Has the frequency or intensity of an event type changed over decades? Answering this requires assessing many observations and studies together.

Specific event

How much did climate change alter the probability or intensity of this event? Answering this requires a relevant attribution study.

Without such a study, GoYeti does not claim a climate contribution to a fire, flood or storm. The map shows the event, not its cause.

IPCC AR6, Chapter 11: Extreme events and attribution
How GoYeti presents this

No automatic climate attribution

01

Live reports describe an event's location, timing and sources.

02

The climate section explains assessed long-term changes, citing sources and uncertainty.

03

A claim about a specific event appears only with a linked scientific attribution study.

Current events are not yet checked automatically for attribution studies.

View current events